On today’s #FollowReader Twittersation, we’ll be joined by Heather McCormack (@HMcCormack), Book Review Editor of Library Journal. Heather’s article (“Patrons Are Consumers, and Consumers Are Patrons; or, How Publishers Can Learn To Stop Worrying and Love Libraries Again”) on the Tools of Change blog has become a jumping off point for a larger discussion about [...]
Posts Tagged ‘indie publishers’
#FollowReader May 7: Heather McCormack from Library Journal
Posted in As Seen On Twitter (#followreader), tagged #followreader, curation, indie publishers, libraries on May 7, 2010 | 1 Comment »
Recap: #FollowReader Nov. 20, 2009: Angela James and Carina Press
Posted in As Seen On Twitter (#followreader), tagged Angela James, Carina Press, e-books, indie publishers on November 24, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
Good question about formats @bradmacl Epub and PDF (DRM-free of course) are the ones we know. Still working out the rest. #followreaderPosted by angelajames Last Friday we had a lovely TwitChat with Angela James, editorial director of Harlequin’s new digital press, Carina. You can read through the full transcript by clicking here (archived TwitChat). [...]
Reaching Out to Readers: ECW Press Recruits Shelf Monkeys!
Posted in Good Ideas Dept., tagged book reviewers, ECW Press, indie publishers, reading, shelf monkey on October 1, 2009 | 1 Comment »
Follow the Reader loves hearing about publishers who love connecting with readers. One such publisher is ECW Press. Their innovative (and adorably named) Shelf Monkey program allow for direct (and very personal) interaction with, and feedback from their readers.
Free Sony Readers for Book Reviewers
Posted in Enter to Win, Good Ideas Dept., Publishing Insurgents Unite, tagged big publishers, book reviewers, booksellers, e-galleys, indie publishers, Kindle, Sony Reader on April 16, 2009 | 24 Comments »
Word has it that a consortium of big publishers are brewing a new strategy for distributing Sony Readers to book reviewers. There are a lot of good reasons for publishers to do this– and some signficant obstacles. What we want to know is, how do reviewers feel about the idea?
